This is the third in a three-part series about women and advertising.
There are plenty of commercials and advertisements aimed at aiding women with feminine health issues, but they are incredibly
secret about what area needs aiding. When using the words “feminine health,” “feminine hygiene,” or “feminine area,” these ads are talking about women’s private parts — the vagina, to be exact.
But the word ‘vagina’ might be too real, vivid, or disturbing to use, as Democratic state representative Lisa Brown found out after saying ‘vagina’ and then being banned from speaking by male politicians who took offense with her choice of words. One colleague, Republican Mike Callton, was very upset and insulted by Brown using the word ‘vagina’: “What she said was offensive. It was so offensive I don’t even want to say it in front of women. I would not say that in mixed company.”
Commercials do not like to mention the word ‘vagina’ either. They dance around the word, fluffing it up, enfolding it in special terms that make no sense. If you are a woman, is not the whole body part of your “feminine area”? After all, women should be feminine, right? So what is it that is so disturbing about a woman’s vagina? Is it because it has multiple purposes: sex, childbirth, discharging blood from the uterus? Or is it solely because women have vaginas? Why is the penis not treated as nuclear waste or a yucky foreign object?
A commercial for the anti-itch cream Vagisil uses the term “down there” to discuss the “feminine area.” Since the commercial does not mention the word ‘vagina,’ it should not insult Mike Callton, but it is insulting to women. The commercial is offensive as it somehow compares women’s vaginas with animals by showing pictures of a porcupine, the spiky puffer fish, a skunk, and a lobster while the female narrator is describing her problems. So not only are vaginas skunky and fishy, but they are also dangerous with pointy thorns and claws that can pinch and hurt you. Really?
Overall, most advertisements for “red days,” “that time of the month,” “feminine itch,” “feminine odor,” and the “feminine area” are all the same: ambiguous and scared of using the proper terminology. That “itch you can’t scratch” might as well be located between your shoulder blades, and that “uncomfortable feeling” might just be restless leg syndrome.
The vagina is considered so embarrassing and so scary that it should not be mentioned by name. The word ‘vagina’ is so awful and insulting that even women, with vaginas, should be embarrassed to utter the word. It is considered important for women to be beautiful and feminine while a very prominent part of the body, the vagina, should not be mentioned by name.
We believe that the advertisements highlighted in our series contribute to the overall notion that women’s bodies are never good enough. The female body is deemed defective, shameful, flawed, and in need of serious “repair” if women are ever going to be happy with themselves. The impossible standards of beauty imposed in commercials like these are negative and detrimental to women as they invoke shame and guilt. Not only do commercials invoke these feelings, they also readily embrace and perpetuate them as part of their tactics, making women feel even worse about themselves. We would like to see advertisements that display women’s bodies in a more positive light, and that cut out the self-blame and shame so common in ads aimed at women.
Great post! Forgot about the porcupines. Yeesh. When you compare the “feminine products” commercials to the ones for “ED” it’s clear that the lady parts are icky and the manly parts are coolio!!
Completely agree. Check out this commercial from axe about “cleaning your balls”. Even though they use actual balls in the commercial, the reference is clear, and very different from commercials aimed at women.
Axe commercial: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfDbUwOFupw
I agree. It’s like how Planned Parenthood claims people are against “women’s health” but what they really mean is “abortion.” “Women’s health” sounds friendly. Who could be opposed to that? They provide abortion and cancer screenings (etc.) and claim people are opposed to women getting cancer screenings. I hate women getting cancer screenings! Haha.
I would argue that choosing to terminate a pregnancy falls under the category of women’s health. Also, just in case you’re not aware of the statistics, Planned Parenthood patient care is 97% of what your definition of “women’s health” covers (screenings, STI testing and treatment, contraception, and other services) and only 3% of that patient care is for services relating to termination. People who are against Planned Parenthood are, IMO, decidedly against women’s health.
Well, I don’t know. A lot of commercials use euphemisms for various body parts and functions: you rarely hear the word “urine” in commercials for bladder control products, for example. And, I might be wrong, but I don’t think ED ads ever use the word “penis”. They do say “erection”, but that can refer to a lot of things, like building construction. And they don’t say “sex” much either: it’s usually “intimacy” or “love” or something. I remember, years ago, reading a comic strip that made a joke about it. An older man says to his grandson, “I’ve been seeing a lot of ads on TV for a new drug, but I don’t know whether I need it or not ’cause they never tell me what it’s for!” I was a kid when Viagra commercials started playing, and initially I had no idea what they were advertising, either. I did, however, understand ads for tampons. So I’m not sure this is sexism so much as it is general discomfort with “private” body functions, male, female or neuter.
Hi Miriam
You’re right, many advertisements aimed at whoever are stereotypical and many of those dealing with sex or tampons or whatever are probably just uncomfortable with the subject.
What we don’t like however is the fact that advertisments try to shame women into buying their products. They claim that something is wrong with you and that you need to be fixed. With their product you can reach perfection. They just help perpetuate the stereotypical notion of what women should look like. To me, this is dangerous since no one is ever perfect. Thanks for writing in and sharing your thoughts!
You make a lot of good points but couldn’t you write an article without attacking men?
“Why is the penis not treated as nuclear waste or a yucky foreign object?”
First off why even mention that at all? I don’t you can compare the two at all and it doesn’t add anything to your conversation.
Also i really don’t think i hear the word penis in commercials if ever.
All that aside i don’t want to hear them talking in detail about vaginas in commercials. The same way i don’t need to hear a detailed ad about adult circumcision or a descriptive hemorrhoid ad.
I think you are focusing on what really amounts to a non issue.
George,
I don’t think that we are actually attacking men in this piece. We are trying to show how women’s bodies are usually portrayed as something to be ashamed of. Often men’s bodies are not talked about in such a shameful way.
I also don’t think that it is a non issue, not to us who constantly have to view these advertisements. It is said that women on average see over 200 of stereotypical advertisements and pictures each day. That is a lot.
But, there are also plenty of advertisements that target men and which are very stereotypical as well; usually telling men how to act like “proper men”. A good place to read about men’s issues is on a blog called xyonline.net. Hennie and I wrote a piece on advertisements aimed at men on this site. It can be found on http://xyonline.net/content/gender-stereotypical-policing-advertisement-act-your-gender. I think you might appreciate it.
Elin