Second-Chance Mother Unravels the Adoption Story

I recently read Second-Chance Mother, by Denise Roessle. The book describes Roessle’s experience of putting her son up for adoption in 1969, and then reuniting with him many years later. Roessle’s story is very powerful, and anyone who reads it realizes that adoption is not an easy decision for anyone involved. Second-Chance Mother is currently the #1 title in the adoption section at Amazon. Over Mother’s Day weekend, over 12,000 readers downloaded a copy of the book.

I caught up with Denise Roessle to ask her a few questions about Second-Chance Mother. When you read what she has to say, I know you’ll have a lot of things to marinate in your brain.

1. What was your motivation for writing Second-Chance Mother?
My initial plan was to write a guide to adoption search and reunion for mothers. After four years in reunion, attending support groups and reading others’ stories, I realized that mothers like me needed help navigating the rough course of reunion. What I had in mind was a book with specifics, real information and advice, not just personal stories, that would help mothers (and possibly adoptees) figure out how to handle things like initial contact, the first meeting, how to deal with adoptive parents’ reactions, etc. Of course I didn’t have all the answers, but I knew where to get them and was planning to research: consulting searchers, adoption therapists, mothers and adoptees who were long into reunion. I had a detailed proposal for the book with a table of contents and sample chapters, which I pitched to various agents and publishers at a writing conference in 2000. I couldn’t convince anyone that this book was viable and needed, even though there were/are six million birthmothers in the U.S. alone. Everyone I talked to, especially after hearing my multi-generational adoption story, said, “write the memoir.” So I began.

My motivation was the same as it was at the beginning: to help other mothers get through this difficult process. As it turned out, in writing the memoir, I helped myself. It was cathartic, working through painful memories and coming to terms with the past. [Read more...]

The 2012 French Presidential Election: Independence and Women’s Rights Threatened by Marine Le Pen

Image courtesy of wikipedia.org

2012 is a crucial year for the future of the United States, but also for France. And France has its share of obscurantists, too. The country’s presidential elections are conducted differently from the U.S.: candidates are elected by members of their parties, and then multiple rounds of public voting determine the winner. The first round of voting will be held on April 22, 2012, and among the candidates is Marine Le Pen, the daughter of Jean-Marie Le Pen, the now-retired politician who founded the far-right “Front National” (National Front) party.

“Women have to be generous”

France is among countries that offer financial assistance to encourage pro-natalist policy; as of 201o, it had the second-highest fertility rate of all European Union countries.

In her interview, Le Pen spoke about many issues relevant to women’s lives. About abortion, she said that “if the financial situation requires it [...] it will be considered to not refund abortion, except in cases of rape [...] women have to be generous by thinking about all the elderly and precarious who today, in France, refuse to be treated by lack of means.” By “not refund,” Le Pen is referring to changing the current system, by which individuals are allowed to receive a refund for health fees. This system is based upon solidarity, with individuals contributing to healthcare costs through payroll taxes. Thus, abortion detractors argue that abortion is not a medical issue, just a consequence of a choice and that the rest of the population shouldn’t have to pay for that.

[Read more...]

Is it Time for the Progressive Movement to Co-opt Family Values Rhetoric?

Senator Kirsten Gillbrand recently announced plans to introduce the “Every Child Deserves a Family Act” in the U.S. Senate. With the National Adoption Month here – not to mention the release of a groundbreaking study highlighting the implications of anti-gay “family values” rhetoric on children and LGBT families – this is the perfect time to get the legislative ball rolling.

As more and more LGBT couples are getting married and starting families, we have a great opportunity to place children without a family into happy homes, either by adoption or foster care. But unfortunately, discrimination against both adoptive and foster parents based on sexual orientation or gender identity is still pervasive in this country. Currently, five states prohibit same-sex couples from adopting, and there are six states that ban same-sex parents from adopting their partner’s children. In all, 31 states practice some form of discrimination against LGBT families.

Precisely why we desperately need this legislation.  [Read more...]

MTV and Abortion

Last night, MTV aired “No Easy Decision,” a half-hour show that told the stories of three young women who had had abortions. Hosted by the omnipresent Dr. Drew Pinsky, “Decision” had a similar format to the network’s popular series “16 and Pregnant,” and in fact devoted the most airtime to Markai, a young mother whose first pregnancy was chronicled during that show’s most recent season.

Markai’s story was indeed compelling. She became pregnant again when her daughter was about eight months old, and neither Markai nor her partner James was confident that they could provide for another child, as they were already struggling financially. Their discussions about which option to choose – adoption, continuing the pregnancy, or abortion – were candid and thoughtful, as were Markai’s talks with her mother and a close friend. Markai eventually decided that having an abortion was the best choice for her and her family, even as she makes it clear that she never thought she’d have to make this decision. [Read more...]

Are CPCs The New Maternity Homes? It Certainly Seems That Way

I came to a scary realization not to long ago: When I was 18 and pregnant, I went to a crisis pregnancy center. Knowing what I do now about CPCs, I realize how easy I got off and shudder to think how bad it could have gotten. Then again, I tend to be pretty strong willed, and my husband says my angry look is scary – it’s possible I glared the woman out of trying to coerce me into adoption and anti-abortion movies.

It was a Birthright clinic (which is, thankfully, no longer there), and I only went to confirm my pregnancy and get a referral to an obstetrician because it was closer to home than the local Planned Parenthood. I left in a hurry because I was sorely, sorely disappointed: the confirmation test consisted of an over-the-counter urine test (of which I’d already taken two on my own – I wanted to be really sure) and despite what I was told over the phone, the woman said they didn’t have referrals to ob/gyn’s and to pick one out of the phone book. Thanks.

Learning what I have since about crisis pregnancy centers, I’ve been continuously baffled at their gall. What on earth would make them think it was OK to out-right lie about medical and legal information and emotionally manipulate vulnerable girls that come to them for help? After reading The Girls Who Went Away by Ann Fessler this weekend, it became clear to me: They think it’s OK because they have recent historical precedent. [Read more...]

The Crisis Pregnancy Center Adoption Racket

cash cowA while back I posted about the lies that crisis pregnancy centers tell women in an effort to persuade them not to seek abortions. They’ll tell you that you’re going to be sterile if you get an abortion, and that you’ll get breast cancer, wind up depressed and addicted to drugs, and find yourself living on the street. Abortion, depression, and drugs, oh my!

Last week the blogosphere and Twitter were all a buzz about the latest aspect to the CPC agenda – adoptions. Crisis pregnancy centers don’t just want you to have your baby – they want you to put it up for adoption so that barren, Christian families can take the child from you. According to an article on Jezebel:

You’re single, pregnant, and scared. Maybe you’re even Christian, in some form and to some extent. You find these nice Christian people who tell you they can help. If you’re still considering abortion at this point, they’ll show you gruesome films and lay on the guilt and shame until you’re not. And then, once you’ve agreed to give birth, they start telling you there’s no way you can hack single motherhood — perhaps adding that God disapproves of the sex you’ve already had and will be even more pissed if you raise this kid without a father or a marriage certificate — and explain that keeping your baby would be selfish and sinful, because there are wealthy, childless Christian couples desperate to give it everything you can’t. Or, as Carol Jordan, who got sucked in by a CPC in 1999, puts it: “[O]nce you say you won’t kill it, they ask, What can you give it? You have nothing to offer, but here’s a family that goes on a cruise every year.” [Read more...]

Poverty and Choice

954858_no_money_1Last night I had the pleasure of reading Jamie Whyte’s Crimes Against Logic: Exposing the Bogus Arguments of Politicians, Priests, Journalists and Other Serial Offenders. It really only took me a couple of hours to finish it–despite such important content, it is very accessible and even made me laugh out loud. Its a great book. Everyone should read it. But I digress.

One of the topics covered in the book is British poverty rates and the ways that they are used by politicians and other groups to advance certain agendas. Basically, he is arguing that British social welfare programs ensure that even the poorest of the poor there aren’t destitute. I would have to know more about the British welfare system to argue with him on this.

But the discussion got me thinking about poverty here. I have said, both in my own posts and in comments to other posts that we will never have real choice unless women can choose to have their children and raise them without fear of a lifetime of poverty and struggle. This country, of course, is nowhere near that point.
[Read more...]

Adopt For Love, Not Politics

mother and childIn a recent article actor Jim Caviezel said “I always thought if I adopted that I wouldn’t have the same feeling [as I would] if they were genetically my own children. Nothing could be further from the truth.” He goes on to say the adoption of his children “challenged him to speak out more on pro-life issues.”  This makes me wonder what his original motivations for adopting were.

Before I go any further, I want to make sure that every reader understands that I am in no way attacking his ability or quality as a father, but I do question the politics behind for adoptions and more importantly using it to speak out against reproductive rights.

The abortion/adoption debate should be centered on pregnant women and birthmothers not fetuses and certainly not children. We see children’s presence in politics way too often. Seeing them or even hearing from them is not what I have a problem with, but it is the parents the use their children as examples for platform decisions. We saw this blatantly with Sarah Palin’s children during the campaign. Who can forget a pregnant Bristol with her then fiancé at the convention? [Read more...]

Obama on abortion: irreconcilable togetherness?

barack-obama-for-presidentAt no point during President Obama’s commencement speech at the University of Notre Dame did he meaningfully engage the abortion debate. Although “the views of the two camps are irreconcilable,” lifers and choicers should “work together to reduce the number of women seeking abortions.” I am usually struck by something unobjectionably good in President Obama’s earnest appeals to moderation and cooperation, but these particular earnest appeals are more irritating than inspiring because they don’t make any sense.

Consider separately the handful of examples offered in this same speech: reducing unintended pregnancies, adoption, and providing care and support for women who choose to carry their child to term.

Unintended pregnancies? The pro-life camp believes in abstinence-only sex education or no sex education at all. Even Feminists for Life, an at least nominally pro-woman pro-life organization, does not take an official position on the use of contraceptives because some of its membership opposes its use. Among the millions of dollars of questionably wasteful pork projects in the stimulus bill – it was increased funding to states for birth control that got the easy axe. [Read more...]