Sotomayor & the Sexist Double Standard

Thursday, 16 July 2009, 13:12 | Category : Judicial Watch

By aj

So, I’ve refrained from posting on the confirmation hearings as of yet because of general frustration. judge sotomayorWatching the questioning process has left me nauseated. Listening to a bunch of racist bullies call a wise latina woman a racist bully, just doesn’t sit too well with me. With that being said, I guess it’s time to talk about it.

Is it just me, or is this confirmation process literally a manifestation of sexist politics? Many senators at the hearings have been questioning Sonia Sotomayor about warrantless accusations that she’s “hot-headed” and “temperamental.” Code for: a woman with an opinion who refuses to be trampled over like a doormat. Because you know, when men in politics act with convinction and strength, they are applauded and idealized. Of course when a woman acts the same way, she’s a cut-throat, bitchy, irrational human being. This double standard that places women as either mute and subordinate, or domineering and over bearing is getting old, real fast.

Peggy Drexler is spot on when she identifies this as age old gender bias. Despite the fact that the job of any judge is to be direct, forceful, and skeptical, women are demonized when meeting those expectations. Honestly, it has alot to do with male privilege and the fear of losing power and influence over the world. Patriarchy fetishizes male characteristics at the expense of women’s experiences and perspectives. Having strong, independent thinking women step into positions of high authority and power, scares gender traditionalists. It’s no coincidence that the same people pushing women back into the kitchen, are denying them access to positions of power in politics. These strategies are one in the same; sexist attempts to sustain patriarchal order. I mean for real, women are either being ridiculed for displaying the same characteristics that male politicians are celebrated for having, or they are attacked for highlighting what they can contribute to politics as women.

A great example of that is the debate over empathy and social identity. Apparently having a comprehensive understanding of your own social location is unheard of to rich white men. Since when is it a negative thing to look at the world differently because of your own experiences? Men have been doing it for centuries; it just so happens that their experiences have inspired them to create and sustain a political structure that benefits a few at the expense of many, and effectively keeps power in the hands of rich, white, heterosexual men. So Judge Sonia Sotomayor is suppose to be ashamed and apologize for a statement about her social location? Its bullshit. Not to mention the fact that this obsession with one remark by Sonia Sotomayor is out of place and unecessary. Why aren’t we discussing her 17 years of judicial experience? Or the near 3,000 cases she has ruled on. Of course when it comes to women, their records don’t matter. Apparently what really matters is their outfit choices and their temper.

Why is it that the public shrugs off temporamental behavior by male politicians? I mean, if we are going to look to the Supreme Court for an example – don’t look further then Justice Antonin Scalia. Everyone seems to shrug off his routine outbursts, particularly his angry letters to newspapers that criticize him, as just an aspect of his political passion. This really sickens me. Its perfectly acceptable for a man to get angry, because its just an extension of his passion for the law. On the other hand, if a woman gets angry, she’s a bitch and she’s undermining her position in the legal system.

A few examples of the bitch-pushover double standard to watch out for:
Women take it personally, men brush it off. Women ask questions, men make statements. Men negotiate, women placate. Women nurture, men take charge. The litany of stereotypes that place women in ugly double standards are endless and they all have the same objective: push women out of the political sphere so that they will stay in their place.

On a less skeptical note, Judge Sonia Sotomayor has been handling this process brilliantly. She has this calm confidence about herself and has clearly proved her ability to withstand the sexist criticism by Republicans. The inspiring nature of this nomination has really been lost in all the crap surrounding this process. Lets not forget that Judge Sonia Sotomayor is the first Latina woman to be nominated to the Supreme Court, and that is incredible. Despite what Republicans want you to believe, diversity on the bench is extremely important. This is a country that is made up of diversity, and it’s high time we stop being represented by one group: white, heterosexual men.

Tags : , , ,

8 Comments for “Sotomayor & the Sexist Double Standard”

  1. 1Annaleigh

    Great post, AJ! My favorite(?) sexist comment so far was Liddy’s fear that menstruation would get in the way of her judgment http://thinkprogress.org/2009/05/29/liddy-sotoyamor-menstruating/

    Goodness knows we don’t want those crazy ladies PMS-ing and sending people to the chair or pushing the red button…

  2. 2aj

    Holy crap, thats outrageous. I guess menstruation must turn women into war mongering, irrational, environment pillaging, crazy folk. Oh wait, I just described men and the status quo.

    I guess Liddy’s never heard of men PMS-ing. They do it all the time. Women just have a damn good excuse for it.

  3. 3Mrs. Mastro

    Great post! You are spot on! Sotomayer has done a wonderful job and, thankfully, it looks like she will be confirmed.

    But…I’m a blogger so I have to fuel the fire some more…I am watching Rachel Maddow (YAY Rachel!) and she is (in her usual patient way) talking to Pat Buchanan. Who says that Sotomayer is an affirmative action baby who was picked because she is Latina, not because she is qualified. He said something similar on another show last night. Only that time he said that she only got in to Princeton because she is Latina.

    Excuse me? Oh…that’s right, Princeton is KNOWN for admitting Latinas, especially the ones with bad grades, low SATs and zero preparation for college. Are. You. F*ing. Kidding. Me? She got into one of the country’s top colleges and she wasn’t qualified to be admitted? I guess if you are Pat Buchanan, it is clear that a Latina couldn’t possibly be smart enough to get into a college like that. Or she couldn’t list anyone so she could get a legacy slot and she didn’t have a rich Daddy to donate a new building so she could get in.

    Rachel is chewing him up and spitting him out, so there is some hope for this world.

  4. 4freewomyn

    Sotomayor has, indeed, been handling herself magnificently. Although there have been a few times where it looked like she wanted to cut someone. I would have punched these senators in the face. Perhaps this is why I’m not in public office.

  5. 5aj

    I’m going to have to catch the late night re-run of the Rachel Maddow show tonight. I have been busy at a Montana Rodeo, sticking out like the gay sore thumb that I am. lol. I love when Rachel shuts Pat Buchanan down. It gives me this overwhelming feeling of joy for some reason.

  6. 6Erika

    let me just say up front i think al this shit started with bush over looking sandra day o’connor (excuse any misspellings) as chief justice and nominating roberts. o’connor was the most well knonw moderate on the bench with the most rulings by case instead of poilitical affiliation. by nominating roberts bush forced o’connor to resign and took an important moderate off the bench to be replaced with an ultra conservative. now obama is doing the same by appointing a staunch liberal. will someon please bring back the moderates to the supreme court??

  7. 7freewomyn

    Erika, that’s some interesting analysis, but I don’t know that the facts bear out in your favor. O’Connor never served as Chief Justice – that was Rehnquist. She was most definitely one of the swing votes. But I highly doubt that the appointment of Sotomayor is going to be do detestable that it will “force” anyone to retire. O’Connor and Rehnquist both left the court due to health concerns.

  8. 8SayBlade

    Great post, but just a little puzzled here. Pairing the two words “Latina” and “woman” is redundant as I understand the term “Latino” refers to a male of Latin American origin.

Leave a comment