Rick Santorum is at it again. The presidential candidate, who already thinks that birth control is “harmful to women” and believes states should have the right to ban birth control, now has his sights set on … prenatal testing.
During an interview on Face the Nation, Santorum criticized President Obama’s healthcare law for requiring insurance companies to cover specific prenatal tests. According to Santorum, since some tests are used to detect genetic abnormalities, they can “encourage” abortions. Therefore, his logic follows, having insurance companies cover the costs of these tests “is a bit loaded.” While Santorum singled out amniocenteses as a test that insurance shouldn’t cover, he said he had no problem with sonograms – even though it is possible for those images to show birth defects or other abnormalities. But I’m guessing in Santorum-land, sonograms are only important when forced on women that want abortions – or trying to make his stance on women’s health issues seem less batshit crazy than it actually is.
Implying that prenatal testing is some sort of gateway drug to abortion procedures is, frankly, ludicrous. According a survey conducted of over 1,200 women that chose abortion, the top reasons for the decision were: concern for/responsibility to others; inability to afford a child; concern that having a child would interfere with school, work, or their ability to take care of dependents; or having problems with their partner or spouse, or not wanting to be a single parent. “Possible problems affecting the health of the fetus” fell far down the list of reasons that these women gave for having an abortion.
Much like his opposition to birth control, this latest stance seems to be much more about Rick Santorum than about what’s best for women and families. Prenatal testing provides information, plain and simple – information that women, and their partners and doctors and whoever else the woman may choose to involve – can then use to make the best decision for themselves, their fetus, and their families. For some women, the choice will be to terminate – but not for every woman. And for parents that choose to continue a pregnancy where there are specific problems, prenatal testing gives those parents the time to prepare themselves for the unique challenges they and their child will face.
But Santorum doesn’t appear to be interested in research, or giving women information, or even what’s best for families that aren’t his. This is just Santorum’s latest attempt to demonize abortion and anything that can be tied to pregnancy termination, no matter how tenuous the threads. If insurance companies no longer covered testing, expectant mothers that can afford it will still have access. But those that don’t have the means may end up with otherwise avoidable complications that put them or their newborn in serious harm.
To even suggest that women and their families should be put in that position is infuriating, and illustrates just how little Rick Santorum trusts women to make their own choices.
|
Sarah's first book, Generation Roe: Inside the Future of the Pro-Choice Movement, will be out March 2013. For more information, follow her on Twitter @saraherdreich, or check out saraherdreich.com. |

The man just blows my mind. I keep thinking that maybe someone will nail him on the “late term abortion” his wife had (if he had been in a Catholic hospital would they have let his wife die?) But I guess he gets a free pass–he and his wife being so far superior to the rest of us. Unfreakingbelievable!
I found it interesting that Bob Schieffer, the “Face the Nation” host, did mention during the interview that Santorum had a child that was “stillborn.” Santorum jumped all over that, and was very forceful in insisting that the child was “born alive.”
William Saletan at Slate had a great article up today, about just how drastically Santorum has changed his tune on late-term abortion. For years he insisted that the procedure was only done on fetuses that had no abnormalities, and now he’s claiming the exact opposite. Wonder if he thought no one would notice?
I think Rick Santorum is great. Many Pro-Lifers have had experiences in their past with abortion. Lots of women that have had abortions now speak out against it. For example, Norma L. McCorvey aka Jane Roe is very Pro-Life. It’s by having an abortion that women really see how devastating it is. I believe Karen Santorum is now more able to speak to women and persuade them to not have an abortion.
I’ve had 2 abortions, and I failed to see how devastating it really was. Actually, I have always felt fine about it. I am now more able to speak to women and persuade them that they can do whatever the hell they want with their bodies.
As far as I’m aware, the Santorums have always denied that Karen Santorum had an abortion.
Kim: Just because a few people regret something that they did does not give the state the right to refuse that choice to others. I never understand the logic of people who bring up the fact that Norma McCorvey is pro-life. So what? These women can’t speak to how “devastating abortion really is.” They can only speak to how devastating abortion was to THEM. If it was so traumatic for them, no one is forcing them to go through that experience again. But that’s a difference pro-lifers just don’t seem to get.
Indeed!
Agreed.
just a tiny point of correction, Santorum doesn’t plan to defund contraception… he doesn’t agree with it personally, but has said he wouldn’t impose his views on others.
Much of what you said is right on the money, and I agree wholeheartedly! However, I didn’t want you to discredit yourself with bias or inaccurate facts.
Rick Santorum: Contraception ‘Should Be Available’ Unless Religious Organizations Object
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/16/rick-santorum-contraception_n_1282339.html
Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum said on Wednesday that, despite his personal opposition to contraception, he wouldn’t work to limit its accessibility if elected president.
“How do I feel about the issue of contraception? It should be available,” Santorum said during an interview with CNN’s Piers Morgan. “I object to [it] when the federal government says that religious organizations who feel the way the Catholic Church feels should be required to provide it. I think that’s an infringement upon their religious liberties.”
“If you look at my voting record, I have a voting record that supports … funding for contraception, both domestically, as well as internationally,” Santorum continued, according to a transcript from NewsMax. “And I would not support any law that would put any restrictions on that.”
Thanks, Melinda! I was going off of information from an October 2011 interview, but I’ll correct the post to reflect the information from the article you cited. I really appreciate the information!
The Huffington Post posted an article this morning on this same subject but they just repeated anecdotal stories and cited statistics from Santorum himself that most fetuses discovered to have downs syndrome are aborted and that basically 100% of Trisomy 18 children are aborted–without any follow up on if these statistics have any credibility. Its very frustrating that a journalist at a respected news source doesn’t have any sense of fact checking what politicians say. Sarah-you cited a survey of 1,200 women who had abortions, did you find any research on how many people decide to have abortions after its discovered the fetus might have birth defects?
This article in the Huffington Post was almost praising Santorum for bringing attention to this issue: “painful emotional decisions received scant public attention before the politically charged remarks from Santorum.” This is the link to the post if anyone is interested. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/22/rick-santorum-prenatal-testing_n_1293153.html?ref=politics