Today’s guest post comes from Philippa Willitts, a British freelance writer who also blogs for The F-Word, Where’s the Benefit?, and her own personal blog. She can be found procrastinating on twitter both personally (@incurablehippie) and professionally (@philippawrites), and she enjoys good food, good friends, and nature.
I grew up Roman Catholic. Nearly all my friends were Catholic, I went to Catholic state schools, and I went to Mass weekly. I took my faith very seriously, and although I was critical of some of the Church’s mandates, such as the ban on contraception, I fell for the anti-choice rhetoric hook, line, and sinker.
The thing is that when you are a rather sensitive teenager, and somebody tells you that people are killing babies, there is no way to understand that other than with horror. Killing babies? This must be stopped!
The thing is, I had no access to an alternative viewpoint. The internet was a mere twinkle in Tim Berners-Lee’s eye, and anyway, what possible arguments could there be FOR killing babies?
One particular Religious Studies teacher laid it on particularly thickly. With what I now know to be misinformation, I was genuinely distressed at her descriptions of the pain these “babies” feel, and the details that are now so familiar from anti-choice placards and websites.
We watched a particularly distasteful film in her class, called The Silent Scream. Footage of abortions with an emotive commentary, complete with foetuses in bin bags and ultrasound scans during a termination procedure. I walked out – I wish I could say that it was because I disapproved of these tactics, but it was in fact because I was so distraught at what I had seen.
However, I did also disapprove of those tactics. Even as a pro-lifer, it felt wrong. If people were to be anti-abortion, surely it should be because abortion is wrong, not because it’s gory. If you are against abortion because it’s gory then you should surely be against heart surgery, appendix removals, and tooth extractions, too.
But I believed all the arguments (it always came back to “killing babies”), and I joined SPUC, the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children. The aforementioned teacher continued her process of indoctrination, and even laid it on about abortion in cases of it threatening the life of the mother (“she has had her chance at life, now it’s the baby’s turn”) and after rape (“she has already been traumatised once, if she has an abortion it will traumatise her all over again,” and “don’t punish the baby for the sins of its father”).
You see, I had been convinced that abortion was really bad for women, too. After abortions women got infections, and breast cancer, and not only that, they were traumatised for the rest of their life. They always regretted their actions, and if we could stop people having abortions it wouldn’t just save a baby, it would save the women from herself, too.
I feel thoroughly ashamed when I recall this, and writing it out is profoundly uncomfortable. However, beginning my life as a pro-lifer means that now, as a passionate pro-choicer, I understand the arguments that pro-lifers really believe. I understand how, and why, they think the way they do, and I understand what they have been told, and in what way, to get them to feel so strongly. I also understand why slogans like, “Against abortion? Don’t have one!” will never, ever work.
When I started to question the indoctrination, the whole thing fell really quite quickly.
I had just moved away from home to go to university. A friend of a friend got pregnant; she, too, had just started uni, and she had just split up with her childhood sweetheart. She knew she had to have a termination, and I supported her in that choice. She didn’t know I didn’t agree with abortion, and it never even crossed my mind to try and dissuade her. I was, however, really worried about her. From all those years of leaflets and booklets and speeches, I was concerned about the months and years of trauma which would lay ahead for her, and how she would cope with that. A few days later I saw our mutual friend and asked how she was. “Oh, she’s fine thanks.”
“Are you sure? She’s not too upset?”
“No, she’s relieved, more than anything.”
I could see the cracks forming in my long-held beliefs before my eyes. This woman was relieved. It didn’t fit what I’d been taught. And if they had lied to me about that, what else had they lied to me about?
Once I started questioning one aspect of the propaganda, the rest of it fell quickly. I started talking to people who were pro-choice, and realised that even what I had been told about pro-choice people was misleading and wrong.
I don’t tell this story with any kind of self-satisfaction at my marvellous conversion. I tell it because it provides an insight into how the indoctrination of children to be anti-abortion occurs. As a feminist activist, I use what I have learned to inform my campaigning, and to understand how best to argue with anti-choicers.
Thanks for your great post and your openness about what motivated you as a pro-lifer (gosh, I dislike that term – what does that make us – anti-lifers?). The bit about what arguments don’t get across really resonates with me. I guess the question is – what do we do to make sure more evidence-based information reaches those who need to hear it and we’re not just continually preaching to the choir.
Thanks Maria. The term ‘pro-lifer’ is pretty misleading and tasteless isn’t it? The reason I use it when I’m talking about my past is just that that was the vocabulary I knew at that time. Interestingly, when I talk about modern-day anti-abortion activists I tend to call them anti-abortion activists, or anti-choicers, but somehow, when talking about what I was involved in, pro-life always seems most natural.
I guess it’s because, at the time, I misguidedly did believe I was pro-life, so that’s how I view that period of time.
This is great. I really loved reading this simply because you clearly demonstrate the campaign of misinformation that antiabortionists use and why they’re so strongly rooted in their beliefs. I’ve actually had someone use every single piece of misinformation about abortion in an argument. It was shocking for me to see that someone could actually believe the horrible lies that he was spewing BUT the way you’ve put it here really puts it in perspective.
Hi Philippa,
So I posted this on my facebook wall and a pro-lifer I know commented with this:
“So she was raised pro-life, had a friend who had an abortion, found out the girl wasn’t traumatized by the abortion, and then she was pro-choice? She doesn’t explain how the rest of the “propaganda” fell apart, only that “cracks started forming” in her long-held beliefs. A single instance of a woman walking away from an abortion relatively unscathed doesn’t seem to be a strong argument against being pro-life. A single instance of anything doesn’t really prove the antithesis of anything else. Maybe she was into the pro-life movement for the fellowship and the pizza, not the convictions. Lots of cute guys at those youth group activities. Also, it would be helpful if she could explain what she had been told about pro-choice people and how it was wrong. Was she told they worshipped Satan and sacrificed small mammals on weekends, that they were Red Commies, that they squeezed their toothpast from the middle?”
Any response that I can pass along to the commenter? I feel like any response from me will be pure speculation so he’ll use it as a way to further undermine what you’re saying.
Wow. Well, there was no fellowship or pizza involved, and I’m a lesbian so any guys, cute or not, had no influence at all. I explained pretty well why I was involved in the movement anyway. My convictions were not in question.
The rest of the propaganda fell away because, on learning that one part of what I had been taught was not true, I started actively looking for information about what else might have been lies. And it turned out that there were lots of lies.
My friend having an abortion was just the catalyst which led me to look further into what I had been taught. For the first time in my life I had access to alternative information, and I learned what was actually true and what was misinformation and lies.
To be honest, your friend has a lot invested in undermining what I’m saying, and no response that I can give here will satisfy him. I could explain myself endlessly, but it couldn’t ever be explanation enough, otherwise that would mean an admission that there is some truth in what I am saying.
Thanks Saira. I think that while I was perhaps too trusting of the opinions I was hearing, the responsibility has to be on those who were giving us these ‘facts’. This was teachers, priests, and campaigners who had a lot less of an excuse to not have double-checked their facts, as adults.
I hate that I fell for it, but when I look at it as a system of indoctrination, I can understand it better. Had I continued with those beliefs into adulthood I would have to hold a lot more responsibility.
I can only conclude that those preaching the anti-choice message were either a) guilty of not doing their research, or b) wilfully using misinformation to further their cause of trying to control women’s bodies.
I expect there are both, in the movement, but these days I’m sure I see more people who fit into point ‘b’!
A pregnant woman has another body inside of her, with a separate heart and brain that have already began to form (maybe you can’t pin point the actual heart or brain yet, but the cells have already began to form a new beign… A beign, not a mass of cancer or any other abnormal growth that was not designed to think, interact, and feel). Chosing the fate of that other body that is within… now thats controling a body. Feti have a body, regardless of their developmental stage, stop controling their bodies. Use contraceptives. If they don’t work (the label does say they are not 100% effective) then people should accept the consequences of their actions. Oh, and just an additional comment. I work with inmates frequently. There are plenty people who know they are guilty but have no remorse. Sometimes I’m guilty and have no remorse (nothing that I’d need to go to jail for), but that doesn’t make my wrongful actions right.
Just because different women react differently to the abortion experience, how are these “lies” being told by Pro-Lifers? If a parent tells a child that if they commit a crime they will live to regret it. Then the child steals something and afterward feels fine and relieved that they didn’t get caught…how did the parent lie? It just means that the child has no conscience for wrong doing. Same is the case for a woman who feels no remorse after an abortion. The undisputed fact remains: Abortion takes the life of a child, regardless of how anyone feels about it. It’s the simple difference between objective ans subjective.
No, it prevents the life of a child. There’s quite a difference.
I have to agree with jamie. Abortion does take an already existing life, (if you’re going to talk about preventing life, that’s what contraception does) and yes, how does that mean the information you received was “lies?” You may decide (subjectively) to disbelieve it, but that does not mean that (objectively) it was wrong. We can’t change reality, only our perceptions of it. You can talk about “indoctrination” but the “doctrine” of the Church happens to be true.