<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Birth Control Combat Global Warming?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://feministsforchoice.com/can-birth-control-combat-global-warming.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://feministsforchoice.com/can-birth-control-combat-global-warming.htm</link>
	<description>Pro-choice and Proud!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:35:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete Murphy</title>
		<link>http://feministsforchoice.com/can-birth-control-combat-global-warming.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1465</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministsforchoice.com/?p=2237#comment-1465</guid>
		<description>The reductions in birth rate necessary to achieve a stable or even declining population are easily achievable without resorting to totalitarian, coercive methods like China&#039;s one-child policy or the forced use of birth control or sterilization.  It can be achieved through simple economic incentives like tax policy.  Most peoples&#039; decisions about the size of their family boil down to economics and, since taxes consume a large portion of incomes, they play a key role in this decision.

The biggest obstacle we face in changing attitudes toward overpopulation is economists.  Since the field of economics was branded &quot;the dismal science&quot; after Malthus&#039; theory, economists have been adamant that they would never again consider the subject of overpopulation and continue to insist that man is ingenious enough to overcome any obstacle to further growth.  This is why world leaders continue to ignore population growth in the face of mounting challenges like peak oil, global warming and a whole host of other environmental and resource issues.  They believe we&#039;ll always find technological solutions that allow more growth.

But because they are blind to population growth, there&#039;s one obstacle they haven&#039;t considered:  the finiteness of space available on earth.  The very act of using space more efficiently creates a problem for which there is no solution:  it inevitably begins to drive down per capita consumption and, consequently, per capita employment, leading to rising unemployment and poverty.  

If you‘re interested in learning more about this important new economic theory, then I invite you to visit either of my web sites at OpenWindowPublishingCo.com or PeteMurphy.wordpress.com where you can read the preface, join in the blog discussion and, of course, buy the book if you like. 

Pete Murphy
Author, &quot;Five Short Blasts&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reductions in birth rate necessary to achieve a stable or even declining population are easily achievable without resorting to totalitarian, coercive methods like China&#8217;s one-child policy or the forced use of birth control or sterilization.  It can be achieved through simple economic incentives like tax policy.  Most peoples&#8217; decisions about the size of their family boil down to economics and, since taxes consume a large portion of incomes, they play a key role in this decision.</p>
<p>The biggest obstacle we face in changing attitudes toward overpopulation is economists.  Since the field of economics was branded &#8220;the dismal science&#8221; after Malthus&#8217; theory, economists have been adamant that they would never again consider the subject of overpopulation and continue to insist that man is ingenious enough to overcome any obstacle to further growth.  This is why world leaders continue to ignore population growth in the face of mounting challenges like peak oil, global warming and a whole host of other environmental and resource issues.  They believe we&#8217;ll always find technological solutions that allow more growth.</p>
<p>But because they are blind to population growth, there&#8217;s one obstacle they haven&#8217;t considered:  the finiteness of space available on earth.  The very act of using space more efficiently creates a problem for which there is no solution:  it inevitably begins to drive down per capita consumption and, consequently, per capita employment, leading to rising unemployment and poverty.  </p>
<p>If you‘re interested in learning more about this important new economic theory, then I invite you to visit either of my web sites at OpenWindowPublishingCo.com or PeteMurphy.wordpress.com where you can read the preface, join in the blog discussion and, of course, buy the book if you like. </p>
<p>Pete Murphy<br />
Author, &#8220;Five Short Blasts&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shanman</title>
		<link>http://feministsforchoice.com/can-birth-control-combat-global-warming.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1453</link>
		<dc:creator>Shanman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministsforchoice.com/?p=2237#comment-1453</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what the answer is but I think i includes accurate sex ed information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what the answer is but I think i includes accurate sex ed information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj</title>
		<link>http://feministsforchoice.com/can-birth-control-combat-global-warming.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator>aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministsforchoice.com/?p=2237#comment-1452</guid>
		<description>another great solution to this problem would be giving out better incentives for adoption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another great solution to this problem would be giving out better incentives for adoption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NancyP</title>
		<link>http://feministsforchoice.com/can-birth-control-combat-global-warming.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1445</link>
		<dc:creator>NancyP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministsforchoice.com/?p=2237#comment-1445</guid>
		<description>Go read Michelle Goldberg&#039;s book, The Means of Reproduction: Sex, Power, and the Future of the World, published earlier this year. Apparently the hardback is being remaindered at half price at Amazon and probably at your local chain bookstore. 

Female social, economic, legal, marital equality is the most important issue for decreasing birth rates, once child health has been raised to the level where it is highly likely that children reach adulthood. Keep in mind that poor / developing countries don&#039;t have government-supported old age pensions along the lines of U.S. Social Security. Children are the parents&#039; hope of survival once the parents are no longer able to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go read Michelle Goldberg&#8217;s book, The Means of Reproduction: Sex, Power, and the Future of the World, published earlier this year. Apparently the hardback is being remaindered at half price at Amazon and probably at your local chain bookstore. </p>
<p>Female social, economic, legal, marital equality is the most important issue for decreasing birth rates, once child health has been raised to the level where it is highly likely that children reach adulthood. Keep in mind that poor / developing countries don&#8217;t have government-supported old age pensions along the lines of U.S. Social Security. Children are the parents&#8217; hope of survival once the parents are no longer able to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.446 seconds -->
