Stand With Senator Kennedy

ted-kennedySenator Edward “Ted” Kennedy of Massachusetts passed away last night. He suffered from a brain tumor and after undergoing surgery he was unable to recover. Kennedy was one of the most influential members of the US Senate in US history. His name marks almost every large piece of legislation to affect progressive change since the 1960′s.

He often said health care reform was the “cause of his life.” In the face of the current debate over health care reform that has become increasingly violent and politically divisive, the liberal guard must band together to pass legislation including a public option for health care insurance. Besides the fact that health care reform is overdue, I say we do it for Teddy!  Stand with President Obama, write to your senators and representatives and demand the passage of legislation including a public insurance option, as well as the inclusion of abortion and family planning care.

Take up the torch that Kennedy tirelessly carried on health care reform. Read the truth about health care reform and how it impacts women and families on the NARAL Pro-Choice Washington website. You can also write to your representatives from this site and make your voice heard.

[Read more...]

Protect Abortion Rights in Nebraska

LeRoy_Carhart__MDOperation Rescue has its newest target: Dr. Leroy Carhart in Nebraska. Dr. Carhart provides abortions and also performs late term abortions just as Dr. Tiller did in Wichita, KS.  Anti-choice extremists are launching an attack against Dr. Leroy because he is unafraid to perform abortion and protect the rights of the women and families who need them.

Dr. Carhart is taking a stand and we must stand with him.

Several groups are staging rallies and counter-protests: Kansas NOW, Nebraska NOW, and World Cant Wait.

Send a letter of support to Dr. Carhart on NARAL Pro-Choice America’s site, or on the NOW national site.

feminist educations

i’ve become cold. yes i have. 

an enlightening conversation with one of my sisters proved to me that i have changed. once a woman who faced the world with her heart, i am now of woman powered by the cerebral cortex. 

my heart has been stifled and silenced by ultimate heartbreak while my mind was cleverly coaxed into dominance by an over-priced graduate education. all irony aside, this epiphany is disheartening and mind-numbing.  

i’ve become a person with an educated intellect capable of rationalizing almost anything. Logic is a powerful thing. Knowledge has the raw power to change us. Knowing makes us wise only until we learn something new. But knowledge and logic can overpower us if we dont know how to use them. I am guilty of this. i have allowed my education to overpower my heart. i have become lopsided. (some might call it jaded.)

[Read more...]

Confirmation Hearing Starts Today

sotomayor 7.12.09Senate confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Nominee Sonia Sotomayor begin Monday, July 13. At first the pro-choice community knew nothing about her record on choice and how she might vote on an abortion case. Unfortunately, we still have no hard evidence. We cannot make assumptions, but over the past few months of the media, congress, and non-profit organizations investigating her record have revealed she may have a progressive bent to her thinking and she may even resemble the legal demeanor of her predecessor, Justice David Souter, which was mindful of precedent, progressive and critically thinking.   

About one month ago, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg made a bold move and publicly announced her endorsement of Sotomayor. This past week, the NY Times ran an interview with Justice Ginsberg revealing her staunch feminist thinking and slightly re-iterating her desire to see Sotomayor confirmed as the first Latina nominee and the third woman nominee. Ginsberg is currently the lone female Justice among 9 members of the high court.  

If not read only for a brief history of women on the court, this exclusive interview is also a wonderful glimpse into a most accomplished woman who openly and proudly asserts her feminism. Justice Ginsberg is an extraordinary human being. Her acknowledgement of having benefitted from affirmative action further promotes the case that new faces and persons of differing opportunity levels must be given the chance to succeed. Our country has greatly benefitted already from the decisions of Ginsberg and how her perspective (juxtaposed with a white male) has brought change to our laws as well as serving as a reminder of the complexity of our world. I am, of course, not hating on all white men, but instead expounding the idea that our world should be lead by more than one group. 

[Read more...]

Different but equal?

Monday the Supreme Court overturned a ruling in the New Haven Firefighter decision made by Judge Sonia Sotomayor when she sat on a 2nd district court with two other judges. In this case, 14 white firefighters sued the city of New Haven, Conn. for discrimination after the city rejected a promotional test when only white firefighters passed and all black firefighters failed. Im not a expert on critical race studies, but this scenario seems very strange when the only people passing this test are whitesonia. The city seems to have rightfully pulled the test as a faulty (biased) basis for promotion. 

Sotomayor has taken a lot of heat on this decision to find favor with the City which realized it issued a racially-biased test to its employees. With the Supreme court ruling to reverse this decision and rule in favor of the white firefighters and their complaint of “reverse-discrimination,” the Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee have been handed some ammunition. It is no surprise the high court’s recent ruling was split 5-4 in favor of the decision. Swing Justice Kennedy siding with the 4 conservatives and the 4 progressive judges holding strong to maintain Sotomayor’s statement. If anything, this ruling from the high court gives us a clearer view of how Sotomayor might align ideologically if confirmed to the Supreme Court. This is an upside. 

The downside is that, 1) our current court is blatantly split conservative/liberal with only Justice Kennedy, and sometimes Stevens, as swing votes (does this mean the justices are looking at each case independent of personal political views, or do we have an entire court of “activist judges?”) and 2) the reversal of the New Haven decision is only non-sensical fodder for the likes of hate-mongering pundits, Limbaugh and Gingrich. Conservatives have been trying to figure ways to push back the senate nomination hearings due to begin July 13th, but maybe now they will embrace an earlier date. The timeliness of this reversal from the Supreme Court is just a little too perfect.

[Read more...]

Sotomayor: Affirmative Action and Ginsberg

ginsburg_ap_163In a rare happening, a Supreme Court Nominee receives advance praise and welcome from sitting Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg. This a high compliment coming from the only woman currently on the court and one of the four remaining Justices we can count on to uphold the ruling to legalize abortion, Roe v. Wade. And, it should be noted that Ginsberg has mentioned more than once the importance of women justices on the court because they bring a perspective very different from male justices. Yet, still airing on the side of caution, we cannot logically deduce any of Sonia Sotomayor’s legal opinions on the right to privacy or on the legality of a woman’s right to choose from this casual endorsement. Bummer. 

In other news, with the Supreme Court nomination hearings due to start July 14, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell says a filibuster is still an option on the table. With Al Franken’s race for Senate still held up in ballot recounts, the Democratic Senate is one senator shy of the 60 votes needed to block a filibuster. The Republican Party strategy for Sotomayor seems to be to postpone the approval of her nomination for as long as possible. At the very latest, we will need a replacement for Justice Souter’s seat by October when he will officially leave his post and the new annual session begins. Presumably, the GOP aims to stall while searching for more, or any, evidence against her that she is pro-choice, pro-gay, or just generally “empathetic” towards people she does not know. 

What is the latest outrage by the GOP against Sotomayor? Calling her a racist wasn’t good enough? Just as President Obama was degraded by republicans for being a political organizer, Sotomayor may now be raked over the coals for being an advocate of affirmative action. In 1994, Sotomayor is quoted promoting affirmative action, saying, “I am a product of affirmative action… I am the perfect affirmative action baby.” She also later acknowledges that she has also benefited from having her test scores overlooked, and admits that before attending Princeton and Yale, she probably did not have the highest score compared to all the applicants. With all the praise Sotomayor receives from respected members of today’s legal and scholarly communities, it cannot be said Sotomayor did not have the potential to become the accomplished doctor of jurisprudence she is today. And it makes one wonder: without an admissions committee slightly overlooking her scores, would Sotomayor have had the opportunity to be the first Latina, and third woman nominated to the Supreme Court?   

[Read more...]

Decoding Nominee Sonia Sotomayor

ap_sotomayor_090528_mnJudge Sonia Sotomayor’s record on abortion is virtually non-existent. The closest she has come to a decision on reproductive rights is the case of Center for Reproductive Law & Policy v. Bush. This case is situated around the Global Gag Rule, also known as the Mexico City Policy, that Bill Clinton repealed, George W. Bush re-enacted, and President Obama repealed. This is a very important policy because its enactment prohibits the US from funding organizations providing contraception, sexual health information, and abortion overseas. I am careful to say this case is “situated around” the global gag rule, since the ruling found by Sotomayor, and a panel of two other judges, has largely been interpreted as an opinion which upholds precedent. In other words, this case should not be used as an indicator of how Sotomayor might rule on an abortion case to uphold or overturn Roe v. Wade.

In response to this ruling, Jill Filipovic from RH Reality Check blog, tells us,

That outcome disheartened feminists, liberals and reproductive justice advocates, and I wish it had been decided differently. But the decision wasn’t necessarily a bad one – and it absolutely should not stop progressive women’s rights activists from supporting her nomination.

If anything, CRLP v. Bush highlights precisely why Sotomayor should, in a sane world, be an easy confirmation: She sticks to the rule of law, respects precedent and writes thoughtful and reasoned opinions.

RH Reality Check is a pro-choice blog, so it can be safely assumed the majority of their bloggers are pro-choice, but I remain skeptical of Sotomayor’s opinion on choice since no proof has yet been provided. [Read more...]

Dr. Tiller & Nominee Sonia Sotomayor

The death of Dr. Tiller is a tragic reminder of the harshly divisive pattern of American politics. Too often we are pulled into debates with only two sides: one side is right, the other is wrong. This type of world continues to breed hate and ideologies that must stand against each other rather than side by side in conversation or negotiation.

Since President Obama announced his nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court last Tuesday, both sides of the abortion issue have pressed the White House for answers. However, there are no legal opinions penned by Judge Sotomayor about abortion or, more broadly, on the right to privacy. This puts anti-choice and pro-choice groups in a precarious position. To assume Sotomayor is pro-choice based on the politics of the President who appointed her would be naïve and dangerous.

In the wake of Dr. Tiller’s recent murder, abortion as an issue will be unavoidably front and center. The American people will want an end to this heinous violence, and it will be watching to see how both sides of the abortion debate work together or not. No one wants this death to be the start of more violence against abortion doctors such as occurred during the Clinton administration. Well, almost no one… Here is part of Randall Terry’s reaction to yesterday’s blood-shed (he is the former director of Operation Rescue, a dangerously anti-choice group), “George Tiller was a mass-murderer. We grieve for him that he did not have time to properly prepare his soul to face God. I am more concerned that the Obama Administration will use Tiller’s killing to intimidate pro-lifers into surrendering our most effective rhetoric and actions. Abortion is still murder. And we still must call abortion by its proper name; murder.”

[Read more...]