I first saw Dirty Dancing when my sister and I went to Space Camp. The counselors needed something to occupy the dozens of pre-teens milling about the camp’s main room, restlessly waiting until our dorms were ready, so into the VCR went this movie I had heard about but never seen. Of course, it’s pretty hard to concentrate on dialogue when a bunch of sweaty, bored kids are yelling and talking and singing along, so the only part I really remember was when Johnny and Baby started making out and a camp counselor leapt to the TV and held a piece of paper over the screen. Naturally, that only served to ensure that all of us were now focused on the screen and very curious about what was behind that sheet of loose-leaf notebook paper.
But the most controversial aspect of the movie unspooled without interference: Penny’s abortion. Which, as Eleanor Bergstein, the film’s writer and co-producer, pointed out in an interview earlier this year with Gender Across Borders, was an integral plot point:
Right before we opened, we were told there would be a national sponsor, and we were very excited, because we thought that meant big time – and that meant a tube of acne cream on every poster. And I was horrified. And I couldn’t do anything about it. And then the sponsors found that there was an illegal abortion, and they were worried that there would be a backlash, or that the Catholic Church would protest, so they came to me and said, “We’ll give you money to go back into the editing room and take the illegal abortion out.” And I said, “Oh, I’d be so happy to, but as it happens, it’s so into the plot that if I took it out, there’s no reason for Baby to learn to dance. There’s no reason for her to dance with Johnny, to dance at the Sheldrake, to fall in love with him, to make love with him, so the whole plot falls apart, so I can’t do it.” And they said, “Oh jeez, too bad,” so the tube of acne cream disappeared, to my joy, and [the abortion] stayed in.”
A lot of movies revolve around unexpected pregnancy, or expected pregnancy – that’s pretty much a Hollywood staple. That Dirty Dancing turns not just around Penny’s unplanned pregnancy but around her decision to have an abortion is notable for a mainstream movie (even one that, like Dancing, was a surprise success).
Also notable? Penny’s support system. She is not ostracized by her friends, who band together to help her raise the money, take time off work without losing her job, and stand by her when she becomes horribly ill after the procedure. Baby’s physician father treats Penny with care and respect when she is sick and reassures her that she can still have children in the future; when he realizes that he unwittingly helped pay for Penny’s abortion, by lending Baby the money, his anger at his daughter is driven by the fact that he paid for something illegal, not that it was an abortion. Penny, Baby, Johnny, and the rest of their friends are shown as courageous and honorable, in direct contrast to the boy who got Penny pregnant and abandoned her.
In an interview with Jezebel, Bergstein said that she wanted to include the abortion storyline because she feared that Roe v. Wade would be overturned. Over twenty years after Dirty Dancing was released, Roe is still the law, but films that present abortion in such a nuanced and realistic manner are very much the exception.
|
Sarah's first book, Generation Roe: Inside the Future of the Pro-Choice Movement, will be out March 2013. For more information, follow her on Twitter @saraherdreich, or check out saraherdreich.com. |
I was around 10 years old or so when that movie came out and I already knew a lot about abortion from my mom and two older sisters. I cheered that Penny was able to get a much needed abortion and that the film was so pro-choice. Its still one of my favorite movies. I didn’t understand why the doctor was soo against the abortion, and had a feeling that I would eventually become a pro-choice ob/gyn. Its so rare to see pro-choice in the media these days. There was one episode on Degrassi Jr High another on Melrose Place but that has been it. It would be awesome if more shows portrayed abortion in a positive light. And if some stars actually endorsed pro-choice organizations like the National Network of Abortion Funds!
I agree – it’s pretty radical that they show the abortion and its aftermath. I was upset when Miranda didn’t get an abortion in Sex and the City. And Knocked Up had an AWFUL portrayal of women who seek abortion. It’s just a measure of how stigmatized abortion is in American when we can’t even fantasize (through the medium of film or television) about women having an abortion.
Serena, Knocked Up is the next movie on my list!
Katherine, it’s interesting that you mention Degrassi. That show is amazingly progressive – the original series, which aired in the late 80s/early 90s, had not only a teen abortion storyline, but also a teen mom storyline. And of course, the “new generation” Degrassi had the abortion storyline that the U.S. affiliate initially refused to air. I didn’t know about Melrose Place – I’ll need to find that episode!
Yes, by all means let’s praise a film that glosses over the whole thing. It just talks about “trouble”, doesn’t even mention a baby, never mind abortion. Trouble is something so vague, I can see how people might accept so easily that it must disappear with no consequences (Penny will still be able to have children, how convenient!), since it would be too brutal and not progressive at all to recognize that an innocent unborn baby is being murdered so that a woman can go on living her dream life. And Baby is a right little hero for making that happen. Hey, if it’s such a heroic thing I can totally see why someone would want to “fantasize about women having an abortion”…
It’s been a while since I saw the movie. But as I recall, Penny–like most women who get abortions–was only weeks pregnant. So that “innocent, unborn baby” being “murdered” probably hadn’t even finished the embryonic stage of development. Penny’s abortion was as much “murder” as spermicide is. The fact that there was so much concern for Penny to get her abortion as soon as possible shows that she and the other teens wanted it done before the fetus developed consciousness. The fact that she’s happy she can still have children also illustrates how Penny is NOT the child-hating feminazi that pro-lifers like to paint women who get abortions as. For all of that, I applaud this movie.
Ioana, have you actually seen “Dirty Dancing”? Penny almost dies – that’s hardly glossing over just how dangerous it was for her to make that choice. Not to mention that she’s hardly having an abortion to live her “dream life” – she’s young, poor, and abandoned by the young man that got her pregnant. Having an abortion means that she can have choices, and I think that that is something worth praising.
Of course I’ve seen it, that’s why I’m commenting. The film says Penny almost dies, but she looks thoroughly undamaged afterwards and abortion is presented as the unique option, an inevitable choice, with only financial issues to consider (which is quite cynical). No other possibility is mentioned – like, say, support from an institution and giving the baby for adoption.
As for the dream life, I was referring to what she said about wanting to dance, that it was the only thing she ever wanted to do. She didn’t talk to the man who got her pregnant about marriage, she asked him for support to get the abortion, the film is quite clear about this. She’s having an abortion so she can keep dancing. So yes, she will have choices. The baby will have none. This is why I can’t agree with feminism (plus the fact that I have a problem with the idea that my ancestors were oppressed by their husbands and fathers, I don’t like determinism, class struggle and all that socialist garbage).
I’ll leave you to your feminist choices, I would just like to suggest a nice piece of SF to reflect upon: Philip K. Dick’s “Pre-persons”. Some quotes are here: http://user.itl.net/~whitsco/prepersons.htm, they will sound absurd, but the whole thing is in fact quite logical, since the limit is arbitrary.
I have to disagree that she looks “undamaged” when she’s in dire need of medical care and plainly terrified. I also disagree that it is cynical to consider the financial issues involved with raising a child as a single parent. Having a child is a huge responsibility – financially, emotionally, physically, you name it – and it is equally responsible to make sure that an individual is actually prepared for what having a child would entail. That’s mature, not cynical.
I am familiar with the Dick story though, perhaps unsurprisingly, I drew different conclusions from the story than you seem to. Perhaps with this story, as with Dirty Dancing, feminism, and class struggle, we’ll have to agree to disagree.
Ioana-I take issue with your ‘problem with the idea that my ancestors were oppressed by their husbands and fathers’. The history of the United States (where I assume you are from) has an easily traceable oppression of women (I’m assuming you mean your female ancestors) by those in power who were men and would have been husbands and fathers. The polite way to describe the oppression of women in the US is to quote Abigail Adams who implored her husband (John Adams) to “remember the Ladies” in drafting the constitution–his curt dismissal of which she responded “I cannot say that I think you very generous to the Ladies, for whilst you are proclaiming peace and good will to Men, Emancipating all Nations, you insists upon retaining an absolute power over Wives.” (side note: Abigail Adams was fortunate enough to be one of the few women in her time that had the ability to read and write, a privilege most women only have now because of the feminists that have come before.)
It took 60 years between the time emancipated male slaves (you know beings who were previously considered to only be worth 1/5th a person) were recognized as people and given full rights under the constitution for women to achieve–not the same rights–but at least the right to vote and therefore the opportunity to fight to be recognized as people and granted full rights under the constitution. Women were considered to be less than slaves. So to say that women were not oppressed goes against history.
Feminism has many facets and to dismiss it because you disagree with certain ideas that are associated with feminism, is to dismiss a lot of really good and important work that women who came before have accomplished.
I saw Dirty Dancing for the first time last night with my wife. We were both surprised that the plot was centered on an abortion. Surely there could have been some other reason that Penny couldn’t dance, but I understand that the director consciously made that choice (to the detriment of the film in my opinion). Obviously we will disagree on the abortion issue here. Some believe that life happens at conception, some believe it’s just tissue until it’s born or even beyond birth in some cases. I personally believe in God and know that murder (especially of the innocent) is wrong. I don’t know when life begins, but I prefer not to mess around or guess at something as important as choosing to end it.
I’m not here to argue my position on abortion as much as I just wanted to get this idea out there. Penny was an equal participant in the act that got her pregnant. Robbie was a loser/jerk we can all agree, and Penny was a victim of his lies in some way, but she did make her own choice. I don’t understand why those that are ‘Pro-Choice’ and feminists shrink away from the initial choice that this woman made on her own. Choices naturally have consequences. We can’t just delete the consequences without greater ones showing up later.
I felt that the movie tried to teach us that love and sex are the same thing. Classic Hollywood. Penny was not the only victim to this lie. Lily (the sister?) fell for it and so did the heroes of the story, Baby and Johnny. How many more who watch this movie with ‘googly’ eyes are learning that having sex at a summer camp has anything to do with the commitment that true love requires. Anyway, just some thoughts…