The sexualization of breastfeeding-enough already!

The recent cover photo of TIME Magazine depicting a mother breastfeeding her almost four-year-old son has caused quite the stir all over America (and has been covered in the news in other countries as well). As part of the parenting style “attachment parenting”, a number of women depicted in the magazine have chosen to breastfeed their children longer than most other women in America (and in the rest of the Western world). Breastfeeding has long been a controversial topic in America as some women choose not to breast-feed at all, while others choose to do so for six months, one year, or much longer than that.

What we will be doing is to shortly discuss the benefits of breastfeeding, for both the mother and the child. We will then discuss why we believe this story received so much attention, focusing on the sexualization of women and the supposed sexualization of the mother-child bond, which was the main concern of some individuals who commented on the story.

Breastfeeding is very beneficial for both mother and child. It creates a connection between the two and has health benefits for both people involved. Breast milk strengthens the child’s immune system and promotes growth and well being (among other things). For the mother, breast-feeding can positively impact the levels of hormones in the body and result in less chance of developing breast cancer. In fact, the only real drawbacks of breastfeeding are that most women cannot further reproduce while breast-feeding (although exceptions certainly exists, such as when women are well fed). Secondly, women who face a lack of resources might have to stop breastfeeding in order to preserve energy (Trevathan 2010).

In the US, only a small number of women breastfeed their one year olds. The reasons for this are plenty. Some women do not want to breastfeed (but prefer using formula or pumping), while others are not able to breastfeed for various reasons. Often, the attitudes towards breastfeeding are culturally dependent. We believe that the article in TIME Magazine received so much criticism because it was produced in a Western country. In many non-Western countries women breast-feed their children longer, while breastfeeding older children is considered natural (Trevathan 2010). [Read more...]

Head of NARAL Pro-Choice America Stepping Down

Yesterday Nancy Keenan, the head of NARAL Pro-Choice America, announced that she is leaving her position at the end of this year. Keenan, who has been the president of NARAL since 2004, cited a concern for the future of the pro-choice movement as a factor in her decision: “If the pro-choice movement is to successfully defend abortion rights, Keenan contends, it needs more young people in leadership roles, including hers.”

It’s no secret that the abortion rights have come under increased attack over the past couple of years. A record number of anti-choice laws were enacted in 2011; earlier this year, controversial mandatory ultrasound laws passed in Virginia and Texas, and Arizona recently approved two incredibly restrictive anti-choice laws.

[Read more...]

Quick Hit: Funny or Die Invites Republicans Into Women’s Vaginas

Need some humor in your week? Check out Funny or Die’s new “Republicans, Get in My Vagina!” video, starring Kate Beckinsale, Andrea Savage, and Judy Greer. A plea from the “real Republican real women of real America” to all women to “open up their legs and let the government in,” this parody cheerfully skewers the idea that the government knows what’s best for women. And the inclusion of a staggeringly stupid quote from Pennsylvania politician Stephen Friend, involving his own special brand of reproductive theory, just serves to underscore the idiocy that is anti-choice politicians making decisions about women’s bodies.

 

My Body, Myself: Or, what’s a gal gotta to do make peace with that chick in the mirror?

Inspired by Maureen Shaw’s post about the pregnant body …  

I know I’m probably asking the wrong crowd, but how do men do it?

How the hell do they stand in front of a mirror, grab their beer belly and grumble–and then toss on a shirt and go on their merry way?

How can they stand the heat in those long sleeves? Is it because they’ve never been taught to think of themselves as decoration? Because bare arms and shoulders haven’t been in for men since the gladiator games? Now that I’ve added my arms to the already-too-long litany of body parts I’m iffy about, I’ve developed a serious case of gender envy. Because I’d love to see myself as I see other women–as I’m (almost fairly) certain the men in my life who love me see me. But it’s not happening. Not yet, at least, though I won’t stop trying.

Till then, there are the questions. [Read more...]

Do Not Let the Bastards Grind You Down

Nolite te bastardes carborundorum
“Do Not Let the Bastards Grind You Down” -Chapter 9, The Handmaid’s Tale

Motion 312, or M-312 is a private member’s bill proposed by Conservative backbencher Stephen Woodworth asking for the appointment of a twelve member special committee to review Subsection 223(1) of the Criminal Code for the purpose of examining existing medical evidence to demonstrate whether or not a child is a human being before ‘complete birth,’ the legal impact and consequences on the human rights of a ‘child’ before the moment of ‘complete birth’ and what options are available to amend or replace Subsection 223(1), which has thus far serviced our Criminal Law more than adequately for several hundred years.

Subsection 223(1) of the Criminal Code was written as part of British Common Law and states that:

223. (1) A child becomes a human being within the meaning of this Act when it has completely proceeded, in a living state, from the body of its mother, whether or not
(a) it has breathed;
(b) it has an independent circulation; or
(c) the navel string is severed.
Marginal note: Killing child

(2) A person commits homicide when he causes injury to a child before or during its birth as a result of which the child dies after becoming a human being.

[Read more...]

The Pregnant Body

As a pro-choice activist (and person who reads the news), the fact that women’s bodies are objects of public discourse is no surprise to me. From birth control to abortion, our reproductive systems take the stage, front and center. We are put under the proverbial microscope, scrutinized and criticized on a regular basis for taking control of our bodily integrity and fertility. Continuing a decades-long trend (or centuries-long, even), this public inspection is at an all-time high, completely fixated on when we – gasp! – choose not to conform to gendered expectations and bear children when we “ought” to.

But what about when we do decide to become mothers?

[Read more...]

The Gratuitously Anti-Choice George Will

In the Washington Post op-ed piece “Jon Will’s Gift,” conservative columnist George Will uses the occasion of his son’s 40th birthday to reflect on raising a child with Down’s Syndrome. The column is moving, profoundly personal – and blatantly anti-choice.

Perhaps that was Will’s intention; after all, the piece does appear in the paper’s editorial section. Perhaps Will wanted to wrap a touching, lovely tribute to his son in gratuitously anti-choice language; perhaps he decided that shoehorning in a slam against private medical decisions would be more insightful than sharing his unique perspective on parenting a child with special needs, and the challenges and joys that that brings.

[Read more...]

Pro-Choice News Roundup

U.S. Nuns Face Vatican Rebuke for “Radical Feminism.” Democracy Now!

Ruben Diaz Compares Abortion to Holocaust. Huffington Post.

Georgia bans most abortions after 20 weeks. Chicago Tribune News.

EEOC covering gender identity discrimination is a big effing deal. Feministing.

The GOP’s New Sneak Attack on Abortion Rights. Mother Jones.

Anti-Abortion group says it has patient records. The Daily Tribune.

My Body: Your Choice? How men control and dominate women’s bodies

Editor’s Note: Today’s we are so luck to have another guest post from globetrotting feminists Elin and Hennie Weiss! Yay! Elin has a Bachelor’s Degree in Psychology and a Master’s Degree in Women’s Studies from University College Dublin, Ireland. Hennie is currently finished up her Master’s Degree in Sociology from California State University, Sacramento. They are both very interested in women’s studies, feminism and the study of men and masculinities, especially so gender role expectations and the representation of women and men in media.

The recent Senate hearing concerning President Obama’s policy on birth control caused quite the stir as an all male panel discussed women’s contraceptive rights. As outraged as many women and men were over the exclusion of females, who are most impacted by birth and contraceptive choices, men’s control over women’s bodies is not a new phenomenon. Across time and continents, women’s rights have been contested, fought against, and denied as men have assumed a paternalistic approach to women’s own choices concerning abortion, contraception, and birth, while issuing themselves the right to decide over women’s bodies. Men’s control over women’s bodies, however, has often been damaging and unhealthy to women. In this piece, we are discussing a few historical examples that showcase men’s influence and control over women’s rights and choices. We want to discuss examples that show that the persistent male control over women’s bodies and choices has not always been based on knowledge or competence but simply has concerned men’s need to control women.

The all male panel that discussed women’s rights to free birth control included men from different races and religious beliefs, as to fairly include different opinions. This panel however lacked one crucial aspect: women and women’s opinions. After all, this was a discussion that concerned women’s bodies, rights and choices. The fact that the panel consisted of all male participants is hugely upsetting. It is not, however, surprising since throughout history there has been a strong tendency for men to infantilize women while believing that women’s opinions are less valid and competent.

Even before the pill was invented and fairly available to women, many women attempted to control their sexuality through different methods aimed at limiting or spacing pregnancy. Since for many years a woman’s sexuality was often controlled by her husband, and marital rape was not seen as problematic, many women faced more or less constant pregnancies. This was especially hard on working class women who had to perform straining work shortly after giving birth, and who lacked the finances to provide for a large number of children. Various abortion methods were looked down upon but were often performed (Abbott 2011). During this time, the most famous abortionists were women while the most focused anti-abortionists were men. A man named Anthony Comstock was one of the most aggressive opponents of birth control (Tyler May 2010). Comstock fought to rid the United States of literature discussing birth control while prosecuting abortionists. He succeeded and in 1873 the Comstock Act was accepted, declaring the obscenity of birth control devices (Abbott 2011). [Read more...]

The Smartwoman’s Guide to Anger Management

I joke a lot here about using my anger for good. Not just because I wonder whether I’ll ever step the whole way out of my younger, nicer, good girl’s shadow–though I do. But because for all the badass transgressive pleasure I’ve had sloshing around in the metaphorical mud–I can build a head of steam, spit nails and boil my blood with the best of them–it’s pretty damn exhausting. Is it an adrenalin thing? Bad stress management? Beats me. The bottom line is I don’t want to spend any more time with myself when I’m angry than I have to.

This is a problem when you like to write about things that matter to you.

So you haven’t seen my posts about the four OB-GYNs in Congress whose unofficial leader proudly proclaimed themselves, ”Southern, conservative, and pro-life. Loudmouthed and red-necked is also a good way to describe us.” Yes, it is lovely that they’ve delivered thousands of babies, and yes, Phil Roe does admit that most OB-GYNs advocate the use of birth control, and yes, it is probably wrong-headed to assume that they are either lying or doing a heck of a job of ignoring their patients’ feelings if they’ve never ever come across a case where they felt their beliefs about abortion challenged fundamentally. But still … Seriously??? Not one woman made ya’ waver for a moment, Phil??? Are ya in there? [Read more...]